#IngressFS December 2018
Full Results
Rank
City
Agents
AP/Agent
Level
AP Earned
Km Walked
Km/Agent
AP Earned
1
Taipei, TW
407
122,012
55
49,658,879
0
0.00
68%
32%
 
2
Osaka, JP
303
109,585
55
33,204,382
1,088
3.59
46%
54%
 
3
Hachioji, JP
184
96,607
28
17,775,764
734
3.99
53%
47%
 
4
Sydney, AU
46
211,341
23
9,721,680
192
4.17
49%
51%
 
5
Budapest, HU
87
189,191
18
16,459,608
216
2.48
56%
44%
 
6
Oslo, NO
56
177,791
18
9,956,271
267
4.77
56%
44%
 
7
Luque, PY
111
75,490
18
8,379,440
186
1.68
46%
54%
 
8
Zaporizhzhia, UA
36
147,892
17
5,324,116
154
4.28
39%
61%
 
9
Echizen, JP
31
156,780
17
4,860,175
89
2.87
50%
50%
 
10
Mexico City, MX
110
157,228
16
17,295,117
316
2.87
47%
53%
 
11
138
177,852
14
24,543,546
379
2.75
45%
55%
 
12
Macau, MO
101
157,450
13
15,902,451
212
2.10
55%
45%
 
13
Centurion, ZA
40
323,894
13
12,955,774
108
2.70
50%
50%
 
14
São Paulo, BR
72
173,007
13
12,456,530
145
2.01
52%
48%
 
15
Ufa, RU
38
128,943
12
4,899,819
109
2.87
58%
42%
 
16
Kaliningrad, RU
74
93,906
11
6,949,042
137
1.85
53%
47%
 
17
Berlin, DE
38
157,756
11
5,994,731
152
4.00
40%
60%
 
18
Belmonte, PT
16
45,596
11
729,539
29
1.81
85%
15%
 
19
Bothell, WA, US
53
279,645
10
14,821,191
135
2.55
82%
18%
 
20
Saint Petersburg, RU
111
86,221
10
9,570,503
258
2.32
50%
50%
 
21
Brisbane, AU
47
109,124
10
5,128,841
171
3.64
50%
50%
 
22
Busan, KR
116
56,058
9
6,502,753
443
3.82
62%
38%
 
23
Stockholm, SE
32
106,152
9
3,396,869
115
3.59
58%
42%
 
24
Vilnius, LT
93
242,537
8
22,555,923
242
2.60
56%
44%
 
25
Bandung, ID
105
129,199
8
13,565,850
198
1.89
48%
52%
 
26
Rockville, MD, US
59
130,901
8
7,723,172
190
3.22
53%
47%
 
27
Yekaterinburg, RU
107
69,079
8
7,391,412
239
2.23
51%
49%
 
28
Curitiba, BR
43
166,569
8
7,162,465
177
4.12
59%
41%
 
29
Winter Park, FL, US
34
131,071
8
4,456,430
150
4.41
54%
46%
 
30
Vancouver, CA
29
103,109
8
2,990,152
0
0.00
64%
36%
 
31
Indianapolis, IN, US
26
82,886
8
2,155,046
74
2.85
68%
32%
 
32
Lower Hutt, NZ
24
80,659
8
1,935,809
60
2.50
54%
46%
 
33
Colombo, LK
117
161,005
7
18,837,537
313
2.68
55%
45%
 
34
Turku, FI
36
161,685
7
5,820,659
156
4.33
50%
50%
 
35
Gloucester, GB
27
187,206
7
5,054,555
139
5.15
40%
60%
 
36
Kharkiv, UA
53
45,453
7
2,409,013
136
2.57
57%
43%
 
37
Vyshneve, UA
85
203,104
6
17,263,813
248
2.92
38%
62%
 
38
Hamburg, DE
54
173,568
6
9,372,675
279
5.17
53%
47%
 
39
Mérida, MX
30
255,132
6
7,653,955
84
2.80
51%
49%
 
40
Nyon, CH
46
109,576
6
5,040,499
201
4.37
41%
59%
 
41
Dnipro, UA
56
84,075
6
4,708,192
159
2.84
53%
47%
 
42
Brasilia, BR
33
130,144
6
4,294,766
79
2.39
62%
38%
 
43
Ankara, TR
22
131,269
6
2,887,912
131
5.95
60%
40%
 
44
Trujillo, PE
13
36,101
6
469,317
25
1.92
50%
50%
 
45
Buenos Aires, AR
84
208,719
5
17,532,426
176
2.10
51%
49%
 
46
59
179,470
5
10,588,713
242
4.10
54%
46%
 
47
Goiânia, BR
24
193,782
5
4,650,770
79
3.29
45%
55%
 
48
Cambridge, MA, US
32
127,807
5
4,089,823
141
4.41
58%
42%
 
49
Victoria, CA
19
215,087
5
4,086,644
85
4.47
70%
30%
 
50
São Luís, BR
31
129,483
5
4,013,965
126
4.06
49%
51%
 
51
Appleton, WI, US
21
175,017
5
3,675,359
62
2.95
46%
54%
 
52
Cascavel, BR
17
183,848
5
3,125,424
14
0.82
33%
67%
 
53
Camaçari, BR
15
93,918
5
1,408,770
38
2.53
49%
51%
 
54
Karagandy, KZ
12
101,638
5
1,219,652
22
1.83
56%
44%
 
55
Townsville City, AU
26
45,647
5
1,186,828
58
2.23
43%
57%
 
56
Ahmedabad, IN
11
84,313
5
927,438
22
2.00
41%
59%
 
57
Santiago, CL
77
146,364
4
11,270,014
228
2.96
54%
46%
 
58
Helsinki, FI
62
109,723
4
6,802,838
232
3.74
50%
50%
 
59
Portland, OR, US
40
168,877
4
6,755,077
139
3.48
56%
44%
 
60
Odesa, UA
56
101,902
4
5,706,534
164
2.93
44%
56%
 
61
Córdoba, AR
25
227,204
4
5,680,105
108
4.32
57%
43%
 
62
Minsk, BY
70
79,839
4
5,588,728
170
2.43
59%
41%
 
63
Grapevine, TX, US
34
161,811
4
5,501,566
96
2.82
58%
42%
 
64
Toronto, CA
32
163,228
4
5,223,280
160
5.00
46%
54%
 
65
Lima, PE
64
67,259
4
4,304,591
143
2.23
50%
50%
 
66
Montenegro, BR
22
139,150
4
3,061,289
59
2.68
63%
37%
 
67
Izhevsk, RU
18
77,499
4
1,394,990
0
0.00
26%
74%
 
68
Fortaleza, BR
47
168,473
3
7,918,216
116
2.47
26%
74%
 
69
Rio de Janeiro, BR
45
138,203
3
6,219,116
68
1.51
48%
52%
 
70
Recife, BR
38
126,581
3
4,810,061
108
2.84
53%
47%
 
71
Mogi das Cruzes, BR
40
114,191
3
4,567,631
68
1.70
68%
32%
 
72
Dresden, DE
39
116,240
3
4,533,378
144
3.69
61%
39%
 
73
Santo Domingo, DO
23
195,309
3
4,492,111
106
4.61
39%
61%
 
74
Frýdek-Místek, CZ
49
86,345
3
4,230,899
218
4.45
55%
45%
 
75
Klin, RU
20
70,736
3
1,414,715
60
3.00
45%
55%
 
76
Samara, RU
34
26,592
3
904,137
65
1.91
38%
62%
 
77
Pistoia, IT
90
124,737
2
11,226,339
307
3.41
35%
65%
 
78
Jihlava, CZ
81
117,878
2
9,548,079
360
4.44
48%
52%
 
79
Malang, ID
32
263,647
2
8,436,689
43
1.34
46%
54%
 
80
Sunnyvale, CA, US
80
84,667
2
6,773,326
199
2.49
45%
55%
 
81
Katowice, PL
53
105,790
2
5,606,847
217
4.09
48%
52%
 
82
San Luis Potosi, MX
26
189,027
2
4,914,714
119
4.58
44%
56%
 
83
Gliwice, PL
44
98,150
2
4,318,595
0
0.00
35%
65%
 
84
Leipzig, DE
47
80,716
2
3,793,651
149
3.17
47%
53%
 
85
Quilpué, CL
26
128,082
2
3,330,137
61
2.35
43%
57%
 
86
Arequipa, PE
24
124,337
2
2,984,096
76
3.17
43%
57%
 
87
Trondheim, NO
13
206,040
2
2,678,519
59
4.54
39%
61%
 
88
Kinmen, TW
13
166,322
2
2,162,183
20
1.54
76%
24%
 
89
Monterrey, MX
45
27,831
2
1,252,407
69
1.53
59%
41%
 
90
Antofagasta, CL
14
86,706
2
1,213,885
58
4.14
37%
63%
 
91
Huánuco, PE
11
91,223
2
1,003,450
32
2.91
42%
58%
 
92
Campo Grande, BR
14
70,619
2
988,663
45
3.21
41%
59%
 
93
Cochabamba, BO
20
42,598
2
851,951
38
1.90
67%
33%
 
94
Coatzacoalcos, MX
10
84,909
2
849,094
22
2.20
58%
42%
 
95
Vitória da Conquista, BR
11
54,258
2
596,838
7
0.64
56%
44%
 
96
Volgograd, RU
20
25,302
2
506,048
34
1.70
53%
47%
 
97
Chennai, IN
11
29,923
2
329,149
0
0.00
20%
80%
 
98
Kortrijk, BE
78
118,263
1
9,224,512
300
3.85
60%
40%
 
99
Bengaluru, IN
48
163,129
1
7,830,176
156
3.25
46%
54%
 
100
Vienna, AT
64
83,655
1
5,353,919
109
1.70
30%
70%
 
101
Bucharest, RO
43
124,252
1
5,342,829
149
3.47
59%
41%
 
102
51
99,671
1
5,083,226
153
3.00
65%
35%
 
103
Montreal, CA
36
133,689
1
4,812,797
132
3.67
48%
52%
 
104
Manchester, GB
26
161,146
1
4,189,800
111
4.27
45%
55%
 
105
Chimbote, PE
27
138,525
1
3,740,162
156
5.78
50%
50%
 
106
Riga, LV
31
117,002
1
3,627,053
79
2.55
17%
83%
 
107
Auckland, NZ
23
141,602
1
3,256,837
100
4.35
41%
59%
 
108
Brest, BY
25
127,582
1
3,189,560
93
3.72
46%
54%
 
109
Foley, AL, US
41
76,393
1
3,132,104
81
1.98
39%
61%
 
110
Innsbruck, AT
23
132,219
1
3,041,028
59
2.57
55%
45%
 
111
Stavanger, NO
15
189,992
1
2,849,887
66
4.40
58%
42%
 
112
Philadelphia, PA, US
44
62,945
1
2,769,571
85
1.93
56%
44%
 
113
San José, CR
18
137,972
1
2,483,489
71
3.94
50%
50%
 
114
Greenville, SC, US
17
146,026
1
2,482,445
0
0.00
58%
42%
 
115
Huancayo, PE
25
92,027
1
2,300,686
80
3.20
44%
56%
 
116
St. John's, CA
13
174,364
1
2,266,728
53
4.08
50%
50%
 
117
Guatemala City, GT
20
107,751
1
2,155,028
52
2.60
50%
50%
 
118
Tyumen, RU
20
88,298
1
1,765,969
94
4.70
28%
72%
 
119
Valencia, ES
30
58,827
1
1,764,796
84
2.80
29%
71%
 
120
Ica, PE
11
157,109
1
1,728,203
26
2.36
32%
68%
 
121
Sharon, PA, US
29
58,441
1
1,694,787
64
2.21
58%
42%
 
122
Calgary, CA
22
75,446
1
1,659,819
59
2.68
68%
32%
 
123
Cuiabá, BR
15
99,971
1
1,499,567
34
2.27
53%
47%
 
124
Barnaul, RU
54
24,993
1
1,349,646
76
1.41
66%
34%
 
125
Paducah, KY, US
13
102,908
1
1,337,798
41
3.15
74%
26%
 
126
Huacho, PE
17
76,221
1
1,295,763
64
3.76
45%
55%
 
127
São José do Rio Preto, BR
14
89,964
1
1,259,497
46
3.29
57%
43%
 
128
Surgut, RU
28
43,755
1
1,225,140
35
1.25
65%
35%
 
129
Monroe, WI, US
30
37,565
1
1,126,935
63
2.10
42%
58%
 
130
Macapá, BR
15
68,270
1
1,024,049
23
1.53
51%
49%
 
131
Mariupol', UA
18
55,550
1
999,907
62
3.44
46%
54%
 
132
Chiclayo, PE
10
98,593
1
985,934
21
2.10
53%
47%
 
133
Oklahoma City, OK, US
18
33,244
1
598,390
31
1.72
38%
62%
 
134
Comodoro Rivadavia, AR
18
26,166
1
470,989
55
3.06
53%
47%
 
135
Pucallpa, PE
12
36,904
1
442,850
18
1.50
57%
43%
 
136
Maceió, BR
8
42,142
1
337,132
6
0.75
66%
34%
 
137
Parnaíba, BR
10
23,709
1
237,093
13
1.30
76%
24%
 
138
Coimbatore, IN
10
10,763
1
107,625
9
0.90
46%
54%
 
139
Taguig, PH
193
88,206
0
17,023,693
0
0.00
62%
38%
 
140
Quito, EC
64
95,992
0
6,143,493
240
3.75
42%
58%
 
141
Reus, ES
32
148,236
0
4,743,539
0
0.00
54%
46%
 
142
Huaraz, PE
12
336,543
0
4,038,514
28
2.33
14%
86%
 
143
Tucson, AZ, US
27
138,903
0
3,750,373
89
3.30
67%
33%
 
144
Sao Jose dos Campos, BR
15
242,877
0
3,643,161
46
3.07
71%
29%
 
145
Tarragona, ES
21
166,845
0
3,503,750
0
0.00
47%
53%
 
146
Myrtle Beach, SC, US
27
120,885
0
3,263,893
70
2.59
38%
62%
 
147
Ottawa, CA
25
123,831
0
3,095,778
91
3.64
44%
56%
 
148
Chornomorsk, UA
29
98,723
0
2,862,963
81
2.79
46%
54%
 
149
Zhovkva, UA
14
204,467
0
2,862,536
59
4.21
52%
48%
 
150
Coacalco, MX
20
141,077
0
2,821,535
21
1.05
54%
46%
 
151
Cape Town, ZA
20
132,566
0
2,651,319
65
3.25
38%
62%
 
152
Puebla City, MX
18
147,168
0
2,649,026
44
2.44
46%
54%
 
153
Cardiff, GB
18
146,560
0
2,638,074
97
5.39
67%
33%
 
154
Rochester, NY, US
26
95,435
0
2,481,300
68
2.62
66%
34%
 
155
Eureka, CA, US
17
139,203
0
2,366,443
51
3.00
48%
52%
 
156
Saratov, RU
27
85,640
0
2,312,285
75
2.78
30%
70%
 
157
Tijuana, MX
24
87,169
0
2,092,057
55
2.29
51%
49%
 
158
Split, HR
11
186,997
0
2,056,972
43
3.91
63%
37%
 
159
Panama City, PA
25
78,902
0
1,972,553
63
2.52
30%
70%
 
160
Canberra, AU
24
81,446
0
1,954,705
74
3.08
36%
64%
 
161
St. Louis, MO, US
14
137,314
0
1,922,400
54
3.86
60%
40%
 
162
Xalapa, MX
13
144,969
0
1,884,594
38
2.92
41%
59%
 
163
Guadalajara, MX
15
124,204
0
1,863,059
71
4.73
39%
61%
 
164
Oaxaca, MX
14
129,220
0
1,809,073
48
3.43
55%
45%
 
165
Blenheim, NZ
11
158,868
0
1,747,549
51
4.64
55%
45%
 
166
Astana, KZ
17
88,321
0
1,501,456
20
1.18
35%
65%
 
167
Edmonton, CA
12
121,699
0
1,460,388
36
3.00
46%
54%
 
168
Salvador, BR
18
78,613
0
1,415,037
19
1.06
49%
51%
 
169
Fort Wayne, IN, US
28
48,412
0
1,355,549
51
1.82
35%
65%
 
170
Midland, TX, US
18
75,206
0
1,353,715
19
1.06
41%
59%
 
171
Dourados, BR
12
105,227
0
1,262,724
31
2.58
54%
46%
 
172
Rosario, AR
14
88,057
0
1,232,796
0
0.00
46%
54%
 
173
Chisinau, MD
10
122,108
0
1,221,084
45
4.50
53%
47%
 
174
Szczecin, PL
36
33,667
0
1,212,014
81
2.25
48%
52%
 
175
Konskie, PL
24
49,765
0
1,194,352
69
2.88
28%
72%
 
176
Pittsburgh, PA, US
15
79,317
0
1,189,750
38
2.53
51%
49%
 
177
Puno, PE
11
92,949
0
1,022,442
27
2.45
44%
56%
 
178
Leon, MX
11
88,985
0
978,832
20
1.82
49%
51%
 
179
Assis Brasil, BR
10
84,520
0
845,197
24
2.40
37%
63%
 
180
Tocopilla, CL
8
105,620
0
844,961
31
3.88
57%
43%
 
181
Pereslavl-Zalessky, RU
33
24,984
0
824,460
49
1.48
52%
48%
 
182
Madison, WI, US
21
33,258
0
698,420
25
1.19
66%
34%
 
183
Iquique, CL
7
98,422
0
688,954
17
2.43
51%
49%
 
184
Laholm, SE
19
34,735
0
659,958
89
4.68
42%
58%
 
185
Cusco, PE
6
106,389
0
638,333
13
2.17
41%
59%
 
186
Fort Myers, FL, US
11
55,550
0
611,054
0
0.00
78%
22%
 
187
Naberezhnye Chelny, RU
21
27,300
0
573,309
61
2.90
60%
40%
 
188
Temiskaming Shores, CA
4
136,512
0
546,049
19
4.75
49%
51%
 
189
Foz do Iguaçu, BR
9
52,756
0
474,804
10
1.11
51%
49%
 
190
Aracaju, BR
14
32,858
0
460,009
32
2.29
23%
77%
 
191
Beirut, LB
18
21,847
0
393,246
15
0.83
64%
36%
 
192
Hobart, AU
12
31,418
0
377,021
27
2.25
69%
31%
 
193
Ilhéus, BR
3
105,276
0
315,827
3
1.00
45%
55%
 
194
Dayton, OH, US
11
27,485
0
302,330
7
0.64
63%
37%
 
195
Hilo, HI, US
10
29,601
0
296,006
0
0.00
50%
50%
 
196
Campos dos Goytacazes, BR
3
81,097
0
243,292
3
1.00
51%
49%
 
197
Sioux Falls, SD, US
8
29,863
0
238,903
22
2.75
77%
23%
 
198
Retalhuleu, GT
7
28,667
0
200,668
18
2.57
56%
44%
 
199
Lázaro Cárdenas, MX
8
10,372
0
82,973
6
0.75
1%
99%
 
200
Medford, OR, US
7
2,218
0
15,525
3
0.43
27%
73%
 
Enlightened
3,809
122,156
431
465,290,818
10,047
2.6
51%
49%
 
Resistance
3,763
116,781
344
439,446,744
10,004
2.7
Total
7,572
119,485
775
904,737,562
20,051
2.6
Average
37.5
111,924
3.8
4,478,898.8
91.1
2.7